Warning: Use Vibrant at your own risk

Interesting read.

I’ve never used it, and never wanted too, because the whole “we don’t know exactly what it is” from every reviewer I ever read:watched, thing never jived with me.

but cool to see our intuition maybe wasn’t so wrong. :cool:

For every reefer who’s using/used vibrant though, I imagine there’s one who decided against it as well. I’m not the only one lol.

Al natural gang ftw.
Exactly, I haven't come across an issue yet that can't be fixed with some time+elbow grease. We hobbyists say "nothing good happens fast in a reef tank" but then turn around and dump a $50 bottle of whatevertheheck into their tank because they spotted a patch of bryopsis ;Facepalm
 
It's pretty disheartening to see all of the apologists in this thread.

The crux of the issue is that if the data presented is to be believed, the manufacturer knowingly misrepresented the ingredients in their product. Whether it works or not is irrelevant. Furthermore, even if it does work, the data shows that the ingredients match a similar product on the market that is sold at half the price. So you're paying double for something that already exists while being lied to about it. I'm not sure why/how anyone would be okay with that.
 
“CAUTION: Harmful if swallowed or absorbed through the skin [...] NOTE: This product contains a chemical known to the state of California to cause cancer”

Just about everything I buy has a state of California warning. It kinda loses its impact. Not saying I’d use or consume vibrant but the California thing is a bit of a joke.

Thank God I don't live in California, I'm safe here from all those things simply by geography
 
It's pretty disheartening to see all of the apologists in this thread.

The crux of the issue is that if the data presented is to be believed, the manufacturer knowingly misrepresented the ingredients in their product. Whether it works or not is irrelevant. Furthermore, even if it does work, the data shows that the ingredients match a similar product on the market that is sold at half the price. So you're paying double for something that already exists while being lied to about it. I'm not sure why/how anyone would be okay with that.

Maybe those people have never had situations of broken trust.

My take on this whole thing is that I have spent ungodly amounts of money on this hobby and being lied to about what a product is, to me, feels like a huge breach of trust and might possibly cause the loss of a huge monetary investment.
 
Not just that. They've just published another video about skipping the ugly phase after the cycle... This time there's no vibrant on the table.

Schermata 2022-03-07 alle 20.38.43.png
I noticed they had some weird picture cuts that were not as fluid as the rest of the video. Depending how long ago they made this video I am willing to bet they had to edit vibrant out of it. That was the go to up to 3 weeks ago and I bet it was made a month or two ago.
 
If you want to get rid of that algae, then yes...it will work. Period. If you want proof that it works....here. Here is a video by BRS themselves, showing that it certainly does work, Even they admit at the beginning of the video that they don't know exactly the ingredients are but if you are wanting to get rid of algae, it will work. And if it killed livestock and/or coral...do you really think it would still be on the market and be selling as good as it does?


Would you use it in your display if you had 10 year old acropor colonies?
 
It does not appear to be what UWC claims. Data clearly suggest it is an algaecide identical to Algaefix (see thread below)

IMO, this as a very serious breach of trust from a company that has insisted it is not an algaecide. It is also a clear breach of the Reef2Reef terms of service (about making misleading statements).

UWC refuses to respond to these allegations despite having been asked to do so.

VERY DISSAPOINTING ! I've used the product multiple times. to top it all off not only did they lie about it being a bacteria/ carbon source style recipe, I would consider what they charged for the 16oz top dollar .
 
Well brs refunded me for my bottle of vibrant. I can't really be mad at them, I feel like they got duped just like us. I'm curious to see what happens to all the videos they have up pushing vibrant...

Now here's the awkward question... lol. What bacteria DO I buy? Like, I'm planning to start a couple new tanks and was planning to use Dr. Tim's stuff.... should I just assume all bottled bacteria without a list of ingredients are suspicious now?
 
Well brs refunded me for my bottle of vibrant. I can't really be mad at them, I feel like they got duped just like us. I'm curious to see what happens to all the videos they have up pushing vibrant...

Now here's the awkward question... lol. What bacteria DO I buy? Like, I'm planning to start a couple new tanks and was planning to use Dr. Tim's stuff.... should I just assume all bottled bacteria without a list of ingredients are suspicious now?

It depends on what you are trying to accomplish. You don't have to buy anything. If you want to cycle a tank then you can of course use Dr. Tim's One and Only for example if you want a fishless cycle. You can also not buy it and do a fishless cycle by tossing in a piece of shrimp and let mother nature take its course. I've used both methods.

In fact no one has to buy any chemicals and the sooner we, as hobbyists, stop with the chemical euphoria we will all be better off. There are some useful tools to help us but a bottle shouldn't be our first choice is all I am saying.
 
I had bubble algae ( valonia ) in my tank and I used vibrant for one month. My tank now is completely bubble algae free.

How vibrant works is really a mystery for me

Cheers
yes, but you are one of the lucky ones.. so many others were not so lucky.. that is a testimony that you may want to keep to yourself for the good of the community.
 
As the largest retailer and a loud voice in the community they are carrying out their duty to inform the community. But they are also being responsible in not throwing down the gauntlet until it is confirmed. I bet Ryan is working bts to convince UWC to fess up themselves to avoid further embarrassment
 
Product should be tested before goes on the market. Now it’s too late for i’m sorry word. Many people really trust places like BRS and buy by their recommendations.
 
We need another laughing emoji. There are posts that are legit funny and then the posts I want to laugh at because they are so stupid. I need the author to know the meaning of my laughter, there is no room for a grey area. I get no satisfaction if their post is stupid but they think my laughter is approval. I need an emoji that says “this is stupid, please stop talking.”
 

IF YOU HAD TO TAKE A REEFING EXAM, WOULD YOU PASS?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 32 45.7%
  • Not yet, but I have one that I want to buy in mind!

    Votes: 9 12.9%
  • No.

    Votes: 26 37.1%
  • Other (please explain).

    Votes: 3 4.3%
Back
Top