Very big words from a guy that use false quotes in a conversation (#84 in this thread, the real post is in #75 in this thread and my answer is in post #96) And who is we? Are you not alone in your pants? And I´m not hearing anything here on the other side of the Atlantic - but I
read some thrash dumping on people that not like your standpoint.
If I read through the stickies in the disease forum - at least I get the impression that QT in the R2R way is recommended is to use chemical prophylactic treatment. However - it has been a small change since
@Brew12 ´s nutrient thread gets sticky. Interesting in this thread
is post #9. I have read many diseases thread when people have been both bassed for not use, and hence recommended, the full cocktail of chemical prophylactic treatments with the word - you must QT. What I and others have try to do is to reclaim the word QT in its orginal meaning - try to show that there is other type of QT than a full chemical warefare.
Sincerely Lasse